Name redacted

Dining Services employee

The female complainant alleged that the male respondent had made an inappropriate statement about orgasms. Both the complainant and the respondent were Dining Services employees. In an interview with a Title IX investigator, the respondent stated that he did remember using inappropriate commentary. The Title IX investigator determined that "inappropriate commentary was used at the workplace" but could not find sufficient evidence to determine that the complainant had used inappropriate language, such as an initial comment, during the incident.

Campus: Merced

Complaint date: None